Subthreshold laser compared to oral spironolactone for the treatment of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: To compare functional and morphological outcomes of Subthreshold Laser (STL) and Oral Spironolactone (SPR) in treating chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR). METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study. Treatment-naïve patients with chronic CSCR treated with STL or SPR were included, and data was reviewed at baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12-month follow-up. Main outcome measures were changes in Central Macular Thickness (CMT) and Subretinal Fluid (SRF) height, and complete resolutions of SRF. Sub-analysis based on retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE) status at baseline was performed. RESULTS: 47 and 47 patients received STL and SPR, respectively. At all timepoints, both treatments significantly improved CMT and SRF (p < 0.05). No significant changes in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were recorded and no significant differences between treatment groups were present at each corresponding follow-up. Complete resolution of SRF was achieved in 29% and 36% of patients treated with STL or SPR, respectively, at 12-months follow up. Eyes treated with STL and intact RPE showed significant SRF decrease at 6 months and significantly better BCVA at 1, 3 and 6 months compared to eyes with disrupted RPE layer (p < 0.05). In both treatment groups, intact RPE was associated with a higher rate of complete SRF resolutions, with 43% vs 13% in the STL group and 50% vs 26% in the SPR group. CONCLUSION: STL and SPR are effective treatments for chronic CSCR. Greater resolution of subretinal fluid was observed in eyes with intact RPE, hence both treatments should be initiated in the earlier stages of the disease.

Therapeutic potential of ramipril, losartan, and spironolactone against sepsis-associated liver tissue injury induced by cecal ligation and puncture in rats.

OBJECTIVE: Sepsis-associated liver injury is responsible for the high morbidity and mortality rates seen with septic shock. Activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is an essential counteractive mechanism during the hypotensive phase of sepsis; however, excessive activation is associated with exaggerated pro-oxidant and inflammatory response, which aggravates organ damage. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of RAAS inhibition on sepsis-induced liver damage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) model was employed as a model of sepsis. Rats were divided into five groups: sham-operated, vehicle-treated septic rats, septic rats treated with ramipril in a dose of 10 mg/kg, septic rats treated with losartan in a dose of 20 mg/kg, and finally septic rats treated with spironolactone in a dose of 25 mg/kg. Rats received the treatment one hour after induction. Twenty-four hours later, rats were euthanized, and serum samples and liver tissue were collected to evaluate liver function and hepatic oxidative, anti-oxidative, inflammatory, and apoptotic markers. The microscopic integrity of the hepatic tissue was also assessed. RESULTS: The results of our study showed that all the treatments used ameliorated sepsis-induced liver injury. This was reflected by improved liver function parameters and histopathological appearance of liver tissue. Treatment with ramipril, losartan, or spironolactone reduced tissue malondialdehyde (MDA), nitric oxide, activated caspase-3, and TNF-α. Moreover, these drugs increased hepatic reduced-glutathione (GSH) levels, superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) expression. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of ramipril, losartan, or spironolactone after CLP produced a hepatoprotective effect in rats, possibly by reducing oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis.

Effect of spironolactone on survival in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported inconsistent results regarding the advantages or disadvantages of spironolactone use in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD). This study aimed to evaluate survival according to the use of spironolactone in a large sample of patients undergoing maintenance HD. METHODS: This retrospective study used laboratory and clinical data from the national HD Quality Assessment Program and claims data. The participants of the quality assessment program were patients who had been undergoing maintenance HD for ≥ 3 months, patients undergoing HD at least twice a week. Patients with no spironolactone prescription during the assessment periods were designated as the control group. Patients with one or more prescriptions of spironolactone during the assessment periods were assigned to the SPR group. RESULTS: The number of patients in the control and SPR groups were 54,588 and 315, respectively. The 5-year survival rates were 69.1% and 59.1% in the control and SPR groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Cox regression analyses showed that the hazard ratio in the SPR group was 1.34 (P < 0.001) in univariate analysis and 1.13 (P = 0.249) in multivariable analysis. Univariate Cox-regression analysis showed a better patient survival rate in the control group than in the SPR group; however, multivariable analyses showed similar patient survival rates between the two groups. CONCLUSION: This study showed no difference in survival between patients undergoing HD with and without spironolactone use.

Several first-line anti-hypertensives act on fibrosarcoma progression and PD1ab blockade therapy.

PURPOSE: Patients are typically diagnosed with both hypertension and fibrosarcoma. Medical oncologists must prescribe suitable anti-hypertensive medications while considering anti-tumor drugs. Recently, immunotherapy has become prominent in cancer treatment. Nonetheless, it is unknown what role anti-hypertensive medications will play in immunotherapy. METHODS: We examined the effects of six first-line anti-hypertensive medications on programmed cell death protein 1 antibody (PD1ab) in tumor treatment using a mouse model of subcutaneous fibrosarcoma. The drugs examined were verapamil, losartan, furosemide, spironolactone, captopril, and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ). The infiltration of CD8+ T cells was examined by immunohistochemistry. Additionally, several in vitro and in vivo assays were used to study the effects of HCTZ on human fibrosarcoma cancer cells to explore its mechanism. RESULTS: Verapamil suppressed tumor growth and showed an improved effect on the tumor inhibition of PD1ab. Captopril did not affect tumor growth but brought an unexpected benefit to PD1ab treatment. In contrast, spironolactone and furosemide showed no effect on tumor growth but had an offset effect on the PD1ab therapy. Consequently, the survival time of mice was also significantly reduced. Notably, losartan and HCTZ, especially HCTZ, promoted tumor growth and weakened the effect of PD1ab treatment. Consistent results were observed in vivo and in vitro using the human fibrosarcoma cell line HT1080. We determined that the Solute Carrier Family 12 Member 3 (SLC12A3), a known target of HCTZ, may be the principal factor underlying its effect-enhancing properties through mechanism studies employing The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data and in vivo and in vitro assays. CONCLUSION: Verapamil and captopril potentiated the anti-tumor effect of PD1ab, whereas spironolactone and furosemide weakened the effect of PD1ab on tumor inhibition. Alarmingly, losartan and HCTZ promoted tumor growth and impaired the effect of PD1ab. Furthermore, we preliminarily found that HCTZ may promote tumor progression through SLC12A3. Based on this study, futher mechanism researches and clinical trials should be conducted in the future.

Comprehensive characterization of the effect of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonism with spironolactone on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in healthy dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the dose-exposure-response effect of spironolactone on biomarkers of the classical and alternative arms of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) in healthy dogs. ANIMALS: Ten healthy purpose-bred Beagle dogs. PROCEDURES: Study dogs were randomly allocated to 2 spironolactone dosing groups (2 mg/kg PO q24hr, 4 mg/kg PO q24hr). The dogs received 7-day courses of spironolactone followed by a 14-day washout period in a crossover (AB/BA) design. Angiotensin peptides and aldosterone were measured in serum using equilibrium analysis, and plasma canrenone and 7-α-thiomethyl spironolactone (TMS) were quantified via liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectroscopy (LC-MS/MS). Study results were compared before and after dosing and between groups. RESULTS: Following spironolactone treatment, dogs had a significant increase in serum aldosterone concentration (P = 0.07), with no statistical differences between dosing groups. Significant increases in angiotensin II (P = 0.09), angiotensin I (P = 0.08), angiotensin 1-5 (P = 0.08), and a surrogate marker for plasma renin activity (P = 0.06) were detected compared to baseline following spironolactone treatment during the second treatment period only. Overall, changes from baseline did not significantly differ between spironolactone dosages. RAAS analytes were weakly correlated (R < 0.4) with spironolactone dosage and plasma canrenone or plasma TMS. There were no adverse clinical or biochemical effects seen at any spironolactone dosage during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with spironolactone increased serum aldosterone concentration in healthy dogs and impacted other biomarkers of the classical and alternative arms of the RAAS. There was no difference in effect on the RAAS between 2 and 4 mg/kg/day dosing. Dosage of 4 mg/kg/day was safe and well-tolerated in healthy dogs.

Prognostic impact of abnormal sodium burden in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: Sodium abnormality is common in patients with heart failure (HF) and is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. The aim of this study is to determine the impact of abnormal sodium burden on long-term mortality and hospitalization in HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). METHODS: We analysed participants from the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) trial with available baseline and follow-up data (n = 1717). Abnormal sodium burden was defined as the proportion of days with abnormal sodium plasma levels (either <135 mmol/L or > 145 mmol/L). To determine the independent prognostic impact of abnormal sodium burden on the long-term clinical adverse outcomes (The primary outcome was any cause death, the secondary outcomes include cardiovascular disease death, HF hospitalization, any cause hospitalization and the primary endpoint of the original study), a multivariable Cox proportional hazard model and time-updated Cox regression model were performed. RESULTS: Abnormal sodium burden occurred in 717 patients (41.76%). A high abnormal sodium burden was associated with 1.47 (95% CI, 1.15-1.89) higher risk with any cause mortality, 1.51 (95% CI, 1.08-2.09) higher risk with CVD death and 1.31 (95% CI, 1.02-1.69) higher risk with HF hospitalization when compared with no burden group. When sodium level changes over time were accounted for in time-updated models, abnormal sodium level was still associated with poor clinical outcomes. Diuretic and spironolactone usage did not show a statistical interaction effect on the prognostic significance. CONCLUSIONS: In HFpEF patients, abnormal sodium burden was an independent predictor long-term any-cause mortality and HF hospitalization.

Phenotyping patients with ischaemic heart disease at risk of developing heart failure: an analysis of the HOMAGE trial.

AIMS: We aim to characterize the clinical and proteomic profiles of patients at risk of developing heart failure (HF), with and without coronary artery disease (CAD) or prior myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS AND RESULTS: HOMAGE evaluated the effect of spironolactone on plasma and serum markers of fibrosis over 9 months of follow-up in participants with (or at risk of having) CAD, and raised natriuretic peptides. In this post hoc analysis, patients were classified as (i) neither CAD nor MI; (ii) CAD; or (iii) MI. Proteomic between-group differences were evaluated through logistic regression and narrowed using backward stepwise selection and bootstrapping. Among the 527 participants, 28% had neither CAD or MI, 31% had CAD, and 41% had prior MI. Compared with people with neither CAD nor MI, those with CAD had higher baseline plasma concentrations of matrix metalloproteinase-7 (MMP-7), galectin-4 (GAL4), plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1), and lower plasma peptidoglycan recognition protein 1 (PGLYRP1), whilst those with a history of MI had higher plasma MMP-7, neurotrophin-3 (NT3), pulmonary surfactant-associated protein D (PSPD), and lower plasma tumour necrosis factor-related activation-induced cytokine (TRANCE). Proteomic signatures were similar for patients with CAD or prior MI. Treatment with spironolactone was associated with an increase of MMP7, NT3, and PGLYRP1 at 9 months. CONCLUSIONS: In patients at risk of developing HF, those with CAD or MI had a different proteomic profile regarding inflammatory, immunological, and collagen catabolic processes.

Taming resistant hypertension: The promise of novel pharmacologic approaches and renal denervation.

Resistant hypertension is associated with an exceedingly high cardiovascular risk and there remains an unmet therapeutic need driven by pathophysiologic pathways unaddressed by guideline-recommended therapy. While spironolactone is widely considered as the preferable fourth-line drug, its broad application is limited by its side effect profile, especially off-target steroid receptor-mediated effects and hyperkalaemia in at-risk subpopulations. Recent landmark trials have reported promising safety and efficacy results for a number of novel compounds targeting relevant pathophysiologic pathways that remain unopposed by contemporary drugs. These include the dual endothelin receptor antagonist, aprocitentan, the aldosterone synthase inhibitor, baxdrostat and the nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone. Furthermore, the evidence base for consideration of catheter-based renal denervation as a safe and effective adjunct therapeutic approach across the clinical spectrum of hypertension has been further substantiated. This review will summarise the recently published evidence on novel antihypertensive drugs and renal denervation in the context of resistant hypertension.

Combination of spironolactone and sitagliptin improves clinical outcomes of outpatients with COVID-19: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: There are evidences showing that sitagliptin and spironolactone can potentially improve the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 cases. In this observational study on acutely symptomatic outpatient COVID-19 cases, we investigated the effects of spironolactone and sitagliptin on the outcomes of the disease. METHODS: This is a prospective, naturally randomized cohort study. We followed mild to moderate symptomatic COVID-19 patients, who were treated with either combination (spironolactone 100 mg daily and sitagliptin 100 mg daily) or standard (steroid, antiviral and/or supportive care) therapy up to 30 days. The primary outcome was hospitalization rate. The secondary outcomes included ER visit, duration of disease, and complications, such as hypoglycemia, low blood pressure or altered mental status. RESULTS: Of the 206 patients referred to clinics randomly, 103 received standard therapy and 103 treated with combination therapy. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics, except for slightly higher clinical score in control group (6.92 ± 4.01 control, 4.87 ± 2.92 combination; P < 0.0001). Treatment with combination therapy was associated with lower admission rate (5.8% combination, 22.3% control; P = 0.0011), ER visits (7.8% combination, 23.3% control; P = 0.0021) and average duration of symptoms (6.67 ± 2.30 days combination, 18.71 ± 6.49 days control; P ≤ 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of sitagliptin and spironolactone reduced duration of COVID infection and hospital visits better than standard therapeutic approaches in outpatients with COVID-19. The effects of combination of sitagliptin and spironolactone in COVID-19 patients should be further verified in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Gene expression analysis to identify mechanisms underlying improvement of myocardial fibrosis by finerenone in SHR.

Both spironolactone and finerenone treatments significantly reduced SBP and there was no statistical difference in their antihypertensive effects. The differences in body weight (at the end of 1/2/3/4 week) to pre-dose body weight ratio and heart rate (at the end of 1/2/3/4 week) to pre-dose heart rate ratio were not statistically significant in the vehicle, spironolactone, finerenone, and control groups.There was no statistically significant difference in mortality among the vehicle, spironolactone, and finerenone groups. The relative heart mass, ANP, BNP, CVF, Col I, TGF-ß, and Casp-3 were gradually decreased in vehicle group, spironolactone group, and finerenone group. Among them, BNP, CVF, TGF-ß, and Casp-3 were significantly decreased in the finerenone group compared with the vehicle group. HE and Masson staining showed that the cardiomyocytes of rats in the vehicle group and spironolactone group were disorganized, with cell hypertrophy, significantly enlarged cell gaps and a large amount of collagen deposition, whereas the cardiomyocytes of rats in the finerenone group and the control group were more neatly arranged, with smaller cell gaps and a small amount of collagen tissue deposition. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) showed that there was a total of 119 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between finerenone treatment and vehicle treatment. Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis showed that the signaling pathways involved were mainly in drug metabolism-cytochrome P450, chemical carcinogenesis, IL-17 signaling pathway, axon guidance, and hematopoietic cell lineage. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) analysis showed that the core genes were Oaslf, Nos2, LOC687780, Rhobtb1, Ephb3, and Rps27a.

Use of Optimal Medical Therapy in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease Undergoing Cardiac Rehabilitation.

Optimal medical therapy (OMT) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and/or heart failure (HF) is underused despite the established benefits of these medications. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) may be one place where OMT could be promoted. We sought to describe the prevalence and characteristics of OMT use in patients with CAD or HF undergoing CR. We included patients with CAD (myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, angina) and HF enrolled in our CR program. For patients with CAD, we defined OMT to consist of aspirin or other antiplatelets, statins, and beta-blockers (BB). For patients with HF or EF ≤ 40%, OMT included BB, spironolactone, and either Angiotensin Converting Enzyme inhibitors (ACEi)/angiotensin receptor blockers or angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI). For CAD patients with normal EF, OMT also included ACEi/ARB/ARNI if they also had diabetes type 2. From January 2015 to December 2019, 828 patients were referred to CR and 743 attended. Among 612 patients (mean age: 65, 23% female) with CAD, 483 (79%) patients were on OMT. Of the 131 HF patients (mean age: 64, 21% female) enrolled in CR, only 23 (18%) met all 3 OMT criteria, whereas most patients were on only 1 (93 %) or 2 (76%) HF specific medications. Spironolactone was the least prescribed (22%) medication. Over the study period, we observed a steady increase in the use of ARNI (2015: 0% vs 2019: 27%, p < 0.01). Among the individuals, 69 patients experienced both CAD and HF, while only 7 patients were under OMT for both CAD and HF. Most patients attending CR with CAD are receiving OMT, but most patients with HF are not. Although OMT has improved over time, there remains room for improvement, particularly among patients with HF.

Controversies in Hypertension V: Resistant and Refractory Hypertension.

Apparent resistant hypertension, defined as uncontrolled office blood pressure despite ≥ 3 antihypertensive medications including a diuretic or use of ≥ 4 medications regardless of blood pressure, occurs in ≤ 15% of treated hypertensives. Apparent refractory hypertension, defined as uncontrolled office pressure despite use of 5 or more medications including a diuretic, occurs in ≤ 10% of resistant cases. Both are associated with increased comorbidity and enhanced cardiovascular risk. To rule out pseudo-resistant or pseudo-refractory hypertension, employ guideline-based methodology for obtaining pressure, maximize the regimen, rule out white-coat effect, and assess adherence. True resistant hypertension is characterized by volume overload and aldosterone excess, refractory by enhanced sympathetic tone. Spironolactone is the preferred agent for resistance, with lower doses. Spironolactone, potassium binders, or both, are preferred if the estimated glomerular filtration rate is below 45. If significant albuminuria, finerenone is indicated. The optimal treatment of refractory hypertension is unclear, but sympathetic inhibition (α-ß blockade, centrally acting sympathoinhibitors, or both) seems reasonable. Renal denervation has shown minimal benefit for resistance, but its role in refractory hypertension remains to be defined.

Resistant hypertension: challenges in everyday practice.

Resistant hypertension is defined as not achieving sufficient control of blood pressure (BP), that is, maintaining BP values equal to or above 140/90 mm Hg when using 3 antihypertensive drugs, including diuretics, properly combined and at maximum doses. The uncontrolled treated hypertension should be confirmed in out­of­office BP measurements, preferably with 24­hour ambulatory BP monitoring. Demographic and clinical characteristics indicate that patients with resistant hypertension are older than the general population of patients with arterial hypertension and more often suffer from comorbidities. When resistant hypertension is suspected, it is necessary to assess whether optimal pharmacotherapy has been prescribed, including appropriate combinations of antihypertensive drugs and diuretics at appropriate doses. It is also important to exclude parallel use of drugs that may have unfavorable interactions leading to an increase in BP. A common cause of pseudoresistant hypertension is a patient's failure to comply with therapeutic recommendations, including a lack of lifestyle changes and nonadherence to the prescribed medication regimen. An important step in management of resistant hypertension is targeted screening with diagnostic tests for secondary hypertension. Expanding of the drug therapy beyond a 3­drug regimen should include a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, in particular spironolactone. In selected patients, device­based hypertension treatment might be considered.

Cost-effectiveness of Spironolactone for Adult Female Acne (SAFA): economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to estimate the cost-effectiveness of oral spironolactone plus routine topical treatment compared with routine topical treatment alone for persistent acne in adult women from a British NHS perspective over 24 weeks. DESIGN: Economic evaluation undertaken alongside a pragmatic, parallel, double-blind, randomised trial. SETTING: Primary and secondary healthcare, community and social media advertising. PARTICIPANTS: Women ≥18 years with persistent facial acne judged to warrant oral antibiotic treatment. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomised 1:1 to 50 mg/day spironolactone (increasing to 100 mg/day after 6 weeks) or matched placebo until week 24. Participants in both groups could continue topical treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cost-utility analysis assessed incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) using the EQ-5D-5L. Cost-effectiveness analysis estimated incremental cost per unit change on the Acne-QoL symptom subscale. Adjusted analysis included randomisation stratification variables (centre, baseline severity (investigator's global assessment, IGA <3 vs ≥3)) and baseline variables (Acne-QoL symptom subscale score, resource use costs, EQ-5D score and use of topical treatments). RESULTS: Spironolactone did not appear cost-effective in the complete case analysis (n=126 spironolactone, n=109 control), compared with no active systemic treatment (adjusted incremental cost per QALY £67 191; unadjusted £34 770). Incremental cost per QALY was £27 879 (adjusted), just below the upper National Institute for Health and Care Excellence's threshold value of £30 000, where multiple imputation took account of missing data. Incremental cost per QALY for other sensitivity analyses varied around the base-case, highlighting the degree of uncertainty. The adjusted incremental cost per point change on the Acne-QoL symptom subscale for spironolactone compared with no active systemic treatment was £38.21 (complete case analysis). CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate a high level of uncertainty, particularly with respect to estimates of incremental QALYs. Compared with no active systemic treatment, spironolactone was estimated to be marginally cost-effective where multiple imputation was performed but was not cost-effective in complete case analysis. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN12892056).

Increasing rates of referrals for investigation of primary aldosteronism at a tertiary centre.

AIM: To describe the frequency and characteristics of patients referred for specialist investigation of primary aldosteronism (PA) in the lower North Island over a 5-year period, and the outcomes of those who received treatment. METHODS: Patients who underwent confirmatory testing or treatment for PA at Wellington Regional Hospital were retrospectively identified and data were collected from electronic clinical records. RESULTS: There has been a five-fold increase in both referrals and confirmatory testing for PA in 2021 compared to 2015. Compared to patients without PA, those eventually diagnosed with PA had a higher ARR, serum sodium, antihypertensive requirement and cardiovascular disease prevalence, as well as lower serum renin, potassium and GFR (all p <0.05), but similar blood pressure. Complete or partial clinical success was achieved in 96% of surgically treated patients compared with 70% of medically treated patients. Thirty-nine percent of patients experienced minor adverse effects with spironolactone and only one significant adverse event was experienced perioperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of referrals and confirmatory testing for PA are increasing in our region. Adrenalectomy and mineralocorticoid antagonist therapy are both safe and effective treatments, although minor adverse effects were common with spironolactone.

Efficacy of spironolactone as adjunctive therapy to sodium valproate in bipolar-I disorder: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of mood and cognitive symptoms of patients with bipolar disorder is associated with many complications and is generally not associated with therapeutic satisfaction. In this clinical trial, we evaluated the effectiveness of spironolactone in controlling mood and cognitive symptoms, sleep quality, appetite, and body mass index in patients with bipolar disorder in manic episodes. METHODS: Sixty inpatients with bipolar disorder in manic episodes were treated with spironolactone/placebo in an 8-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. They were evaluated using the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), mini-mental state examination (MMSE), Pittsburgh sleep quality index, Simplified Nutritional Appetite Questionnaire, and body mass index in weeks 1, 4, and 8. RESULTS: For cognitive impairment (MMSE), there were significant interaction effects of group and time at week 8 (B = -1.60, SE = 0.69, t = -2.33, p = .021) such that individuals in the spironolactone group experienced more improvement in their cognitive performance. For manic symptoms (YMRS), there were no significant interaction effects of group and time at week 8 (B = -2.53, SE = 1.46, t = -1.73, p = .085). CONCLUSIONS: Considering the promising findings in this clinical trial, further study of spironolactone as adjunctive therapy in bipolar disorder in manic episodes with larger sample sizes, multicenter settings, and longer follow-ups are recommended.

Who and How Should We Screen for Primary Aldosteronism?

There are mounting data that at least 30% of hypertensives who are appropriately screened have primary aldosteronism (PA), rather than the commonly reported figure of 5% to 10%. Second, there are similar data that undertreated patients with PA have a 3-fold higher risk profile than essential hypertensives with the same blood pressure levels. Third, clinicians managing hypertension measure success as sustainable lowering of blood pressure; untreated hypertensive patients with PA are thus in double jeopardy. Finally, and crucially, fewer than 1% of patients with hypertension are ever screened-let alone investigated-for PA. Accordingly, for "Who should we screen?" the answer is simple-all patients with hypertension. For "How they should be screened?" the answer is also simple-add spironolactone 25 mg/day for 4 weeks and measure the blood pressure response. In established hypertension, a fall of <10 mm Hg means PA is unlikely; above 12 mm Hg PA, it is probable. Newly presenting hypertension is much the same-hold off on first-order antihypertensive(s) and prescribe spironolactone 25 mg/day for 4 weeks. If blood pressure falls into the normal range, continue; if it does not, prescribe a standard antihypertensive. It is likely that the above protocols-a first start, amenable to refinement-will find additional hypertensives with unilateral PA; it is probable that the overwhelming majority will have bilateral disease. What this means is that we have a major public health issue on our hands: how can this be the case?